Mobile applications for suicide prevention: what about?
March ten2022 – Mobile apps could provide “an uninterrupted crisis response tool” for people with suicidal thoughts and behaviors – although further research is needed to establish their effectiveness – concludes a review in the March/April issue of Harvard Review of Psychiatry. The journal is published in the Lippincott portfolio by Wolters Kluwer.
In particular, applications based on an approach called momentary ecological intervention (EMI) can offer a useful tool for managing patients at risk of suicide, according to the review by Enrique Baca-García, MD, PhD, of IIS – Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain and colleagues. They write: “These interventions can be useful adjuncts to traditional care, especially in situations where face-to-face care is not possible.”
“Suicide prevention in your pocket”? So far, mixed evidence on effectiveness
Suicide remains one of the leading causes of potential life lost globally, as suicide rates may increase during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Mobile health interventions offer a great opportunity to provide “low-cost, 24/7 support” to people at high risk of suicide, especially those who have had previous suicide attempts or thoughts suicidal.
Momentary ecological interventions are a particularly promising approach, with the potential to provide one-time help to patients with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. “For example, NDEs can enable patients to adopt coping strategies when experiencing a breakdown or to interact with the environment in different ways, such as contacting professionals or family members during a crisis,” write Dr. Baca-García and his co-authors. Although NDEs have been used in other psychiatric disorders, less is known about their potential use for suicide prevention.
Dr. Baca-García and colleagues identified 27 studies of 19 different IME interventions designed for suicide prevention. At the time of the review, 10 of the 19 interventions had at least one study assessing effectiveness. Researchers assessed characteristics of IME interventions and evidence of their effectiveness in preventing suicide. Eight studies, evaluating seven interventions, targeted adolescents at risk of suicide.
Safety planning was the most common component of EMI interventions. “A safety plan consists of designing a series of strategies with the support of a clinician aimed at providing support during a suicidal crisis,” explain the researchers. Some apps, including safety plans, have taken advantage of digital media – for example, showing photos of loved ones, videos with relaxation techniques, or maps showing the quickest route to disaster relief. emergency.
Some NDE interventions incorporated different types of approaches, such as cognitive behavioral therapy, which teaches strategies to alleviate dysfunctional thoughts or behaviors; or dialectical behavior therapy, targeting healthy approaches to managing stress, emotions, and relationships.
Of the 10 NDE interventions with efficacy studies, five had evidence of decreased suicidal thoughts and behaviors. “These mixed results suggest that there is still a long way to go before [EMI interventions] can be systematically implemented in clinical practice,” write Dr. Baca-García and colleagues. Interventions based on cognitive or dialectical behavior therapy were more likely to reduce suicidal thoughts – although many of these tools also included elements of safety planning.
The studies reported high interest and good retention rates among participating patients. Teenagers and young adults could benefit the most from new technologies in mental health: they are comfortable with the use of digital technologies and are the age group most affected by suicidal thoughts and behaviors.
“The constant progress of technology leads us to believe in the great potential of [mobile health] interventions to contribute to the field of mental health,” conclude Dr. Baca-García and coauthors. “And mobile apps, with their ability to serve as an uninterrupted crisis response tool, represent a promising field of action for suicide prevention efforts. “
Click here to read “Suicide Prevention in Your Pocket: A Systematic Review of Momentary Ecological Interventions for Managing Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors”.
About Harvard Review of Psychiatry
the Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scientific reviews and perspectives on a wide range of important topics in psychiatry. Founded by Harvard Medical School’s Department of Psychiatry, the journal is peer-reviewed and not sponsored by industry. It belongs to Harvard University and is affiliated with all departments of psychiatry at Harvard University Hospitals. Articles cover major issues in contemporary psychiatry, including neuroscience, epidemiology, psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, history of psychiatry, and ethics.
About Wolters Kluwer
Wolters Kluwer (WKL) is a global leader in professional information, software solutions and services for clinicians, nurses, accountants, lawyers and the tax, finance, auditing, risk, compliance and regulation. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by delivering expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with advanced technology and services.
Wolters Kluwer achieved annual sales of €4.6 billion in 2020. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries and employs around 19,200 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.
Wolters Kluwer provides trusted clinical technology and evidence-based solutions that engage clinicians, patients, researchers and students in effective decision-making and outcomes in healthcare. We support clinical efficiency, learning and research, clinical monitoring and compliance, and data solutions. For more information about our solutions, visit https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/health and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter @WKHealth.
For more information visit www.wolterskluwer.com, follow us on TwitterFacebook, LinkedIn and YouTube.
Harvard Review of Psychiatry
Warning: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of press releases posted on EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.